That's like the Cigarette companies in the 40's and 50's being the ones researching and disseminating to the public the health implications of tabacco.Ĭlick to expand.I’m a video engineer who has written a video player from scratch, and I have independently positioned a blank div on top of our video element. Shouldn't people always be skeptical of any company that controls either the platform (MS in the 90's with the OS) or the content (Google in modern day with search, advertising, and content) pushing their own product (IE in the 90's and Chrome in modern day)? Or are those people just happy to see their browser of choice being the bully? Will those same people also enjoy some other browser coming along and using their dominance in some area to sabotage how Chrome works? Assuming something like that ever happens.

I get that people enjoy MS getting some of their tactics from the 90's thrown in their face. Backlash ensued.įast forward to today, and Google is using it's dominance in many parts of the web (virtual monopoly in pre-recorded video content, YouTube, for example and near monopoly on mapping with Google Maps) to push Chromes dominance over other browsers. In the 90's MS used it's dominance of Windows in PCs to push IE over Netscape. To add to this all, when we asked, YouTube turned down our request to remove the hidden empty div and did not elaborate further. Now while I'm not sure I'm convinced that YouTube was changed intentionally to slow Edge, many of my co-workers are quite convinced - and they're the ones who looked into it personally. On the whole, they only made the web slower. What makes it so sad, is that their claimed dominance was not due to ingenious optimization work by Chrome, but due to a failure of YouTube. Prior to that, our fairly state-of-the-art video acceleration put us well ahead of Chrome on video playback time on battery, but almost the instant they broke things on YouTube, they started advertising Chrome's dominance over Edge on video-watching battery life. I very recently worked on the Edge team, and one of the reasons we decided to end EdgeHTML was because Google kept making changes to its sites that broke other browsers, and we couldn't keep up.įor example, they recently added a hidden empty div over YouTube videos that causes our hardware acceleration fast-path to bail (should now be fixed in Win10 Oct update). Can you imagine if all of a sudden Google apps start performing better than anyone else's?' This is already happening.

'For example, they may start integrating technologies for which they have exclusive, or at least 'special' access.

Microsoft edge xbox buddha